Jamaat Ahmadiyya al Mouslemeen
Friday Sermon of
22 May 2009 |
At Bait-ul-Rahma Mosque
|
|
FRIDAY SERMON 22 May 2009
After reciting the Tashahhud, the Ta’uz and the first chapter Al Fatiha of the Holy Quran, Hazrat Amirul Mo’emenine, Zafrullah Domun said: As I told you last week Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas came to teach Ahmadis in particular and the world in general to be broadminded in their outlook especially with those whose opinion differs from theirs especially in religious beliefs. However, unfortunately when we cast a glance on the last hundred years we see that although the mainstream Jamaat at times has been very bold in challenging the opinions of other Muslims and Christians, yet it could not deal in an appropriate way when some of its doctrines were challenged from the inside by its own members. Today we see that the defenders of the Ahmadiyya doctrines are unable to hold a conversation or a dialogue with an Ahmadi who challenges some of the long held doctrines of the mainstream Jamaat. The officials of the Jamaat have preferred to follow a policy of “ignorance is bliss”. But unfortunately at the same time it is keeping its 200 million?-strong members around the world ignorant of something that is fundamental for their salvation. But does Jamaat Ahmadiyya these days still care about people’s salvation? There is no denying the fact that Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas formed this Jamaat to help people to know Allah. Prior to joining the Jamaat a member should accept the ten conditions of allegiance. These ten conditions are, so to say a summary of all the teachings of Islam. Yet today we see that at the international level and also inIt is quite unfortunate that the
International and local Jamaat despite all the means at their disposal
cannot make a real and true assessment of the number of Ahmadis around the
world. Previously we heard there were 200 million. With the arrival of the
fifth caliph, it appears that there was a need to set matters right. We
started hearing 160 million. Yet last year the newspaper Times online
published from an interview of the caliph the figure 170 million. Which is
which? How come that the
numbers are so exaggerated? Look at Last week I said that I will continue with quoting from that article of Hazrat Masih Maood as in my next sermon. But when I read what I had left I notice that there was not more to be told about the subject we were talking about from that article. But Alhamdo lillah I have seen another article where this matter has been further dealt with by the promised Messiah. The matter under discussion is “religious differences”. Hazrat Masih Maood as says: “Religious
difference is a fine thing. God in His wisdom has intended it to be there.
It sharpens the human intellect. In the world even if there is agreement
on some matter, it is still difficult to get to the finer details and many
other minor matters continue to raise their heads. Making speeches in
large gatherings for the purpose of exchanging ideas is also a good thing
but in our country, up to now, such civilized people have been very few in
number who would sit and listen to the views of their opponent in silence.
I myself wished and it was my intention that we should make available a
place in Qadian where people of different religions could gather and
freely express the truth and qualities of their religion. I know that if
there were debates and discussions for the expression of truth it would be
a very good thing but experience has proved that they contain elements of
mischief and disorderliness and therefore such discussions have not been
pursued. It is possible that there may be a handful of people who would
listen to their opponent’s views with patience and kindness but the
majority is made up of ordinary people who are not able to listen to even
one word against their own religion no matter how gentle it
is. But if a person of a different
religion is to speak then it is very possible that there may be some
things which are said which go against another religion and as a result of
this people’s emotions are aroused. In such a gathering there can be peace
only when the speaker and the listeners can sit together just as when a
father sees something bad in his son and he advises the son who listens
with patience and kindness. The attraction of such love proves beneficial.
To hope for any benefit to ensue from a state of anger and viciousness is
an idle thought. The difficulty these days is that not only is there the religious difference, but what has compounded the problem is the fact that it is no longer the concern of the people to concentrate upon the basis of the truth but animosity and ill feeling against each other has developed to such an extent that to refer to the opponent’s religion with respect or honour is considered a sin. I see that people speak with much disrespect and rudeness.”
When Hazrat Masih
Maoodas uttered these words he was speaking about differences
between Muslims and Hindus. But unfortunately these days even Ahmadis are
having problems to speak amongst their own brothers in an atmosphere of
peace and goodwill. Just imagine how true these words of the Promised
Messiah are. I am quoting these extracts from Hazrat Masih
Maoodas with a view that our brothers from the mainstream may
reflect and act upon these advices of the Promised Messiah and discard
their bigoted and narrow-minded attitude which is unworthy of a follower
of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, a prince of peace. At another place
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad speaks about the attitude of some people who
engage in religious debates with people who are so passionate about their
religious beliefs that they are rude in the way they talk. He
says: 30 “To
go to gatherings made up of such people and to enter into religious debate
then becomes a very delicate matter. Because you know that when two people
stand opposite each other with the sole purpose of proving that the
other’s religion is completely wrong and has no share in truth or
spirituality, and is in fact dead and has no connection with God, until
such time as they prove this of the other person’s religion, they find it
difficult to show the beauty of their own religion. The errors of the
other religion have to be pointed out. If the faults which exist in it are
not mentioned then there can be no expression of truth. But some people
get over-excited by this and they cannot bear to listen and their emotion
erupts into violence and they are ready to fight. Hence, to go to such gatherings is against good sense because for religious analysis it is essential that people come to a religious gathering with a cool heart and with a nature which is fair and just. It is better if they don’t have any inclination toward quarrelsomeness or violence. Then, in such an atmosphere one person can describe the qualities of his religion and speak as much as he can and then someone from the other group can stand up and in a similar civilized, gentle manner can describe the qualities of his religion. This can be repeated many times but, unfortunately, in our country up to now such patient and gentle (religious) analysts do not exist. Such a time has not yet come. But, yes, it is hoped that God will soon bring such a time. I even intended that we should prepare a building here in which people from various religions could speak freely (about their religion). In truth if a matter is not heard with a cool heart and a fair mind and with an inclination towards tolerance then it is extremely difficult to get to its true reality. Take a small case in the courts, for instance, where the judge listens with a cool head to the evidence and excuses from both sides and, after much thought and careful analysis, he makes a decision. Sometimes this takes many years. When such is the case with worldly matters, how can matters of religion be resolved in two or four, or ten or twelve minutes? It is easy for the enquirer to put the question but the difficulties faced by the person responding are not easy to imagine. If a person puts the question that tells me about the solar system and the stars and the earth and (also states that) answer me in the time that I have taken to put the question – give me the answer within that time otherwise you are a liar. Now, the predicament of the person who has to give the answer is quite evident. What can he do? Until he writes a book made up of many chapters, the answer will not be complete! In short, these are the types of difficulties I face. These are the reasons which prevent me from attending such gatherings. If, however, the questioner takes the stance that this is my question and I will listen quietly until you have completed the answer, then the person replying would enjoy giving the answer. In truth that which is spoken for God and the heart which does so for the sake of attaining God’s pleasure and is full of righteousness, such a person would never do this (i.e. indulge in the use of bad language). But these days tongues are like knives and objections are raised one after the other (for no real purpose). When it is done (i.e. questions are asked) for the sake of God then the style is different and the language used is different. That which comes from the heart reaches the heart! I can smell the scent of the question which comes from a sincere seeker of truth. Even harshness when it comes from a seeker of truth has a certain element of enjoyment. It is his right that he persists until he finds satisfaction (in the answer given) and until all the evidence is provided he can certainly continue in his questions. I don’t mind this at all. On the contrary, such a person is worthy of respect. Words which are for God have no comparison with deceiving utterances of the baser self. I have repeatedly explained to my community that they should not be hasty in objecting to others. Every ancient religion was infact, from God but the long passage of time has caused errors to develop. These should be removed gently and softly. Don’t present anyone with the stone-like gift of an objection. We see that if today we buy some material and have it made up into a garment, after a short time it becomes old and undergoes change so much so that it becomes something very different (from its original shape). Likewise, ancient religion too contains the root of truth within it. God is with truth and the true religion contains within it living signs.”(Review of Religion August 2002)
Incha
Allah whenever I have new quotations from Hazrat Masih as I
will speak about them so that we may educate the members of the mainstream
Jamaat about the teachings that they have forgotten. In addition all
members of Jamaat Ahmadiyya Al Mouslemeen may know what are the real
teachings that they have to adhere to always. May Allah help us to stay on
the right path for ever.
|